Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

Proportional EGH Modeling

How to Modify the Component Proportions

First, let us introduce what we think are the standard steps as follows.

  • Default decomposition

  • Show the default proportions

  • Decompose with modified proportions

  • Confirm by comparison Plot

zeros at the angular ends of error data have been replaced with the adjacent values.
<Figure size 1600x800 with 8 Axes>
array([0.44395829, 0.07063981, 0.4854019 ])
Proportions of the first decomposition: [0.44395829 0.07063981 0.4854019 ]
Proportions of the second decomposition: [0.31999337 0.19999916 0.48000747]
<Figure size 1600x800 with 8 Axes>

In this comparison plot, we can compare the propotions easily.

How to Vary the Component Proportions

In the previous example, we could be reasonably confident about the number of components, to a certain extent, based on the observation of the elution curve. However, that is not always the case. To illustrate this, let us consider another example where we cannot be so confident.

Below, we will decompose another sample in two ways: first into two components, and then into three components. We will also vary the proportions using another utility function.

Preparation

For effective observation, we will also prepare the Rg curve.

Loading...

Varying Proportions into Two Components

array([[3. , 1. ], [3. , 1.28571429], [3. , 1.57142857], [3. , 1.85714286], [3. , 2.14285714], [3. , 2.42857143], [3. , 2.71428571], [3. , 3. ]])
<Figure size 2000x800 with 16 Axes>
<Figure size 640x480 with 2 Axes>

Varying Proportions into Three Components

array([[3. , 1. , 1. ], [3. , 1.28571429, 1. ], [3. , 1.57142857, 1. ], [3. , 1.85714286, 1. ], [3. , 2.14285714, 1. ], [3. , 2.42857143, 1. ], [3. , 2.71428571, 1. ], [3. , 3. , 1. ]])
<Figure size 2000x800 with 16 Axes>
<Figure size 640x480 with 2 Axes>